However, subjective assessments are vulnerable to cognitive biases like overconfidence, hindsight bias, and anchoring—common pitfalls also studied in financial decision-making. Integrating behavioral finance education into sport science helps coaches, athletes, and analysts recognize these biases, improving how they blend subjective feedback with objective data. For example, understanding loss aversion can explain why a coach might overvalue a recent mistake in a subjective rating, while training in debiasing techniques leads to more balanced, evidence-informed evaluations. Ultimately, the most robust sport assessment frameworks marry objective measurement with subjectively derived wisdom, refined through behavioral principles originally developed in financial contexts.